Friday, January 30, 2009

Profitable PPC: Best-Kept Secret in PPC? Part II

Today's Column: » Best-Kept Secret in PPC? Part II 
About | SEW Blog | Forums | SEW Experts | Search 101 | Ratings & Stats | View Online
SearchEngine Watch SEW Experts Profitable PPC
ClickZ - Internet Marketing Solutions for Marketers ClickZ Events - World's Largest Online Resource of Interactive Marketing News Search Engine Watch - Tips About Internet Search Engines and Search Engine Submission Search Engine Strategies - the intersection of search, marketing & commerce
Search Engine Watch - Search Engine Marketing Tips & Search Engine News Subscribe to SEW Newsletters Subscribe to SEW RSS Feeds Find/Post Jobs How to Advertise on SEW Member Login


SES New York 2009


Top Jobs

Internet Marketing
SpeakerCraft Inc. Riverside, United States

Digital Marketing Specialist
The Nature Conservancy Seattle, United States

539985
Kaplan Higher Education Columbia, United States

Web Editor II/Producer
Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Princeton, United States

Information Architecture Manager
Marriott International Bethesda, United States

More Jobs More Jobs
SEW Expert - David  Szetela
Best-Kept Secret in PPC? Part II
More SEW EXPERTS: PROFITABLE PPC SEW EXPERTS: PROFITABLE PPC

By David Szetela, Search Engine Watch, Jan 30, 2009
Columns  |  Contact David  |  Biography

Last week's installment, "Google Conversion Optimizer: Best-Kept Secret in PPC?," generated more interest and response than anything I've ever written. Seems the promise of simplifying the time-consuming, complicated chore of regulating keyword bids is especially appealing to many of you.

Before I get to answering questions from the mailbag, I want to underscore and clarify some of the points I made last week.

First, the help files for Conversion Optimizer (CO) are very detailed and informative -- a definite "must read."

Second, Google recently lowered the barrier to entry: the minimum number of conversions per campaign over the previous 30 days dropped from 50 to 30.

Thanks again for your emails and tweets to @Szetela. One reader reminded me that CO works especially well on Content Network campaigns, both placement-targeted and keyword-targeted ones. In fact, Google told me that CO varies bid by target site; that's a real time-saver.

A few readers wrote to say they tried CO subsequent to my article, got poor results, and switched it off. Take some Ritalin, fellas; as Google and I have emphasized, it can take a week or more for the CO algorithms to properly calibrate. Try it again and wait longer. You can minimize your risk by trying it on less-critical campaigns first.

Another reader pointed out correctly that the advertiser sets the maximum CPA, not the target CPA. So it's likely you'll need to set the max CPA somewhat higher than the average CPA you want to attain over time. Non-risk-averse advertisers can use Google's suggested maximum and lower it gradually over time. More-prudent advertisers can start just north of their target CPA, say 10% higher, and gradually increase it.

One reader said that they were unpleasantly surprised that when they turned off CO, their original CPC bids had disappeared, and they had to spend months to get the campaigns back to their original state. That may have happened when CO was still in early beta; Google says now that original bids are retained and become active when/if CO is switched off.

One final note: I'm happy to see that automated bid management software vendors are building multiple-attribution tracking into their products, making it possible to use that data to weight bid prices appropriately (see last week's column for background). Our friends at Marin Software just announced the release of such functionality in their Marin Search software.

Please do keep letting me know about your experiences with CO. Next week I'll wrap up the discussion of landing page design and optimization. Then the following week, I'll start bringing you up to date on latest developments and cool techniques in Content Network advertising.

A lot has happened since I wound up the Content Advertising column last June. Anything else you'd like me to cover? Tweet me and/or join the discussion at the Profitable PPC forum!

» Print this article   » E-mail a colleague   » Send feedback

Biography
PPC Advertising expert David Szetela founded Clix Marketing in 2003, following a 25-year career in technology sales and marketing. He is active in the Search Engine Marketing Professional Organization (SEMPO) and was the author of two lessons in SEMPO's Advanced Search Advertising course. He is a regular speaker at PPC Summit, MarketingSherpa and SES events, and his weekly radio show, PPC Rockstars, is broadcast every Monday at 4 PM EDT on Webmasterradio.fm.

Article Archives by David Szetela:
» Best-Kept Secret in PPC? Part II - January 30, 2009
» Google Conversion Optimizer: The Best-Kept Secret in PPC? - January 23, 2009
» PPC Landing Pages: Surprising Examples - January 9, 2009
» PPC Landing Pages: PPC Visitors Have ADD - December 18, 2008
» PPC Landing Pages: The End of the Line -- Or the Beginning? - December 4, 2008
» More from the Mailbag: Quality Score Mysteries and Great PPC Learning Resources - November 20, 2008
» More Articles by David Szetela

We want to know what you think about David Szetela’s column, "Best-Kept Secret in PPC? Part II". Rant. Rave.
» Voice your opinion


Send Us Feedback! | Technical Questions or Bug Reports | Legal Notices, Licensing, Reprints & Permissions | Privacy Policy

Incisive Interactive Marketing LLC. 2008 All rights reserved.

To unsubscribe via postal mail, please contact us at:
Incisive Media Plc.
120 Broadway, 5th Floor, New York, NY 10271
Please include the e-mail address with which you have been contacted.

How to Advertise | Contact Us | Subscribe to Newsletters | ClickZ.com

Click here to update your profile or unsubscribe.
EmailLabs - High Performance Email Marketing
Get a Free Email Marketing Demo
All ClickZ newsletters are sent from the domain "newsletters.clickz.com".
When configuring e-mail or spam filter rules, please use this domain name rather than the sender address, which varies.

No comments: