Friday, February 13, 2009

SEM Crossfire: Should Google Buy Twitter?

Today's Column: » Should Google Buy Twitter? 
About | SEW Blog | Forums | SEW Experts | Search 101 | Ratings & Stats | View Online
SearchEngine Watch SEW Experts SEM Crossfire
ClickZ - News and expert advice for the digital marketer ClickZ Events - Solutions for Interactive Marketers Search Engine Watch - Search Engine Marketing Tips & Search Engine News Search Engine Strategies - the Event for Search Engine Marketing & Optimization
Subscribe to Newsletters Subscribe to RSS Feeds Free Webcasts Members Area Forums How to Advertise


SES New York 2009


Top Jobs

Product Marketing Manager
Marin Software San Francisco, United States

Account Executive - SEM (SaaS) Company - San Francisco
Marin Software San Francisco, United States

Sr. Account Executive - SEM (SaaS) Company - New York
Marin Software New York, United States

Client Services Support Associate
Marin Software San Francisco, United States

Client Services Product Specialist
Marin Software San Francisco, United States

More Jobs More Jobs
SEW Expert - Frank Watson
Should Google Buy Twitter?
More SEW EXPERTS: SEM CROSSFIRE SEW EXPERTS: SEM CROSSFIRE

By Frank Watson, Search Engine Watch, Feb 13, 2009
Columns  |  Contact Frank  |  Biography

Google's attempts to break into the social networking space haven't really been too impressive, though they obviously recognize its importance. Their Open Social involvement and launch of Friend Connect show they have commitment. The problem? Their efforts haven't proven as popular as Google Search or Gmail.

Actually, they should've worked more on integrating something through Gmail, which could have had a much more viral reach. People could have simply clicked to recommend it to others.

Twitter would be the perfect platform. Though if they're feeling really generous, they should buy it and keep it free, sort of like what they did with Google Analytics. It would give them the hottest thing in social media right now and an area that could use some help with tracking success.

Left to its own devices, Twitter could create a large chink in Google's armor. It generates traffic and is far more accurate on building TrustRank.

True, people are gaming it to some point, but fakes are found out a lot quicker than they are in search results pages. While the fake Dalai Lama grabbed tens of thousands of followers, he was shot down inside 36 hours.

The Immediate Social Search Option

The power of Twitter goes beyond just what it can offer as far as keeping Google at the head of all things online. It could easily integrate a button at the top to be able to search the Web and take people to a Google search page. I'd use it. I've had to tab out of Twitter many times to find something for someone.

Plus, they would have the impact of the search function in Twitter itself. My friend Avi Wilenski told me he used Twitter when his hosting went down to see if others were having the same problem and complaining.

For immediate search of events, such as the recent plane crash in the Hudson River or comments on the inauguration, nothing beats the speed of Twitter search.

The element of branding and reputation management would also be a big plus to their large advertisers. They could add Twitter comments in to Google Alerts and have real time comments being sent to people. The options here are endless.

Danny Sullivan, in his SMX keynote this week, asked Google and Yahoo to integrate Twitter search. Maybe if Google bought it, they could tweak the search option as well as really learn something about TrustRank. The interrelationship of followers and the use of retweets may give them some deeper understanding that could be then applied to the search algorithm.

"Why [don't] Google and Yahoo offer Twitter search? Gives people instant feedback. Was that really an earthquake? Is everyone else's power out? Develop a hyper-real-time tool to see what's being buzzed about," Danny was reported as saying by Lisa Barone.

We know they couldn't do it on their own. Jaiku got pulled, and the rest are just passive efforts to have a hand in the space.

So please, Google, grab Twitter and do the right thing -- the "not evil" thing -- and keep it a free resource that you can add a search tab to and grab revenue from right there.

Chris Boggs Fires Back

I've only recently joined Twitter and am starting to understand its potential.

A partner in our company, Adam Cohen, is someone who I would refer to as a power user. He has evangelized the value of it as both a networking and knowledge-sharing tool, and has developed a pretty impressive following.

I asked him why I get so few responses to the types of tweets I post, such as asking for feedback on Ethnio, Google's First Click Free, and other tactics or tools we (or our clients) have considered testing. He advised me that I need to be more direct and call-out specific @'s in order to get momentum for the feedback.

Adam's advice makes me feel that you're on the right track in your analysis of Twitter, Frank. This tool has very powerful trust and "folksonomic" implications, and it may be wise for Google to test it out.

Friend Connect is no less of a bomb than Google Co-Op seems to have been, but the possibly more useful combination of some Co-Op factors with Twitter could make things very interesting.

For those unfamiliar, Co-Op allows signed-in users to label or tag sites around a particular subject. Some users, such as Dr. Choi, have become in essence "power users," as evident by the sites they have labeled within the pharmaceutical industry, for example. This user was already trusted by the system back in 2006 when I was first experimenting with Co-Op. His hypothetical Twitter network may certainly be well qualified to collectively influence certain rankings, so that could be an interesting test.

If Google buys Twitter, it will be interesting to see how much they would pay. Even more interesting would be to see if they kept it free, and how they would leverage the community. There certainly is a lot of space on the site layout for AdSense boxes, that's for sure.

Please share your thoughts with Frank Watson and Chris Boggs on Twitter.

» Print this article   » E-mail a colleague   » Post a comment

Biography

Frank Watson has been involved with the Web since it started. For the past five years, he headed SEM for FXCM -- at one time one of the top 25 spenders with AdWords. He has worked with most of the major analytics companies and pioneered the ability to tie online marketing with offline conversion.

He has now started his own marketing agency, Kangamurra Media. This new venture will keep him busy when he is not editing the Search Engine Watch forums, blogging at a number of authoritative sites, and developing some interesting online community sites.

He was one of the first 100 AdWords Professionals, a Yahoo and Overture Ambassador, and a member or mod of many of the industry forums. He is also on the Click Quality Council and has worked hard to diminish click fraud.

Article Archives by Frank Watson:
» Should Google Buy Twitter? - February 13, 2009
» Battling Click Fraud is Important for All Involved - January 30, 2009
» We're All Convertibles, And It's Time to Take the Top Down! - January 9, 2009
» Could the Web be the Answer to Economic Plight? - December 5, 2008
» Creating Simple, Yet Impressive Charts - November 17, 2008
» Porn and Gambling: Canaries in the SEM Coal Mine? - October 31, 2008
» More Articles by Frank Watson


Send us Feedback | Technical Questions or Bug Reports | Legal Notices, Licensing, Reprints & Permissions | Privacy Policy

Incisive Interactive Marketing LLC. 2009 All rights reserved.

To unsubscribe via postal mail, please contact us at:
Incisive Media Plc.
120 Broadway, 5th Floor, New York, NY 10271
Please include the e-mail address with which you have been contacted.

How to Advertise | Contact Us | Subscribe to Newsletters | ClickZ.com

Click here to update your profile or unsubscribe.
EmailLabs - High Performance Email Marketing
Get a Free Email Marketing Demo
All ClickZ newsletters are sent from the domain "newsletters.clickz.com".
When configuring e-mail or spam filter rules, please use this domain name rather than the sender address, which varies.

No comments: